Jump to content
Anonym bruker

Helsikes antivaxxere!

Recommended Posts

Anonym bruker
45 minutter siden, tante grusom master of law skrev:

Har du døtre? Hva hvis hun blir gravid og får røde hunder? 

Hva hvis gutten eller datteren din får kreft fordi du valgte å ikke vaksinere mot hpv?

Tenker du på at ditt valg nå, gir konsekvenser for barna også i voksen alder?

Hva hvis datteren din blir autist på grunn av vaksiner? Hva hvis datteren din far sovesyndrom? Kan si det samme tilbake. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortsetter under...

Anonym bruker
52 minutter siden, Pashla skrev:

Meslinger er en fare som kan avverges. 

Den kan bilulykker og. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
51 minutter siden, Pashla skrev:

Samme om jeg reiser eller ikke: meslinger er ikke noe jeg kommer til å ha med med inn på legevakten, ikke noensinne.

Som om du veit det. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tante grusom master of law
2 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Hva hvis datteren din blir autist på grunn av vaksiner? Hva hvis datteren din far sovesyndrom? Kan si det samme tilbake. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Det er overhodet ingen sammenheng mellom vaksiner og autisme. Les ordentlig forskning og ikke konspirasjonsteorier. Tror du jorden er flat også?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pashla
19 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Som om du veit det. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Ja. Det veit jeg ettersom jeg hadde meslinger som barn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
22 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Hva hvis datteren din blir autist på grunn av vaksiner? Hva hvis datteren din far sovesyndrom? Kan si det samme tilbake. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Nei, du kan ikke si det, for det stemmer jo ikke🤷‍♀️ Skulle tro motstanderne etterhvert faktisk skjønte det, man er jo blind og dum om man i dag ikke vet hva som er riktig. 

Anonymkode: f8d97...75e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Annonse

Pashla
23 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

http://dangersofvaccines.com/harmful-ingredients-vaccines/

Les og lær. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Oj. Her blinker det useriøst i alle lampene mine. Halvparten av sida er memes, den andre halvparten er påstander uten fyllstoff.

Si meg, tror du at du dusjer i hydrogen også? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pashla
24 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Hva hvis datteren din blir autist på grunn av vaksiner? Hva hvis datteren din far sovesyndrom? Kan si det samme tilbake. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Datteren din kan ikke få «sovesyndrom» av vaksiner. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
32 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Hva hvis datteren din blir autist på grunn av vaksiner? Hva hvis datteren din far sovesyndrom? Kan si det samme tilbake. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Det er vel få ting som er forsker så mye på som akkurat autisme og vaksiner. Det er ikke funnet noen sammenheng mellom mmr-vaksine og autisme. Ingen. Null. 

Sovesyndrom, tenker du på narkolepsi? Det er vel en svært, svært sjelden bivirkning. 

Kjenner du til mulige «bivirkninger» av polio, meslinger, persisterende HPV-infeksjoner, pnumokokksepsis, kikhoste, kusma, røde hunder osv osv?

Jeg klarer ikke helt å bli sinna når vaksinemotstandere sprer galskapen sin, men gud hjelpe meg så pinlig det er. 

Anonymkode: f4c8e...3fd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
45 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

http://dangersofvaccines.com/harmful-ingredients-vaccines/

Les og lær. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Jeeeez! Forventer du virkelig at vi skal ta denne nettsiden seriøst? Det er kun svada. At du tar det på alvor sier mye om intelligensnivået... 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️

Anonymkode: f75d5...a45

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hannasbananas
Akkurat nå, Anonym bruker skrev:

Jeeeez! Forventer du virkelig at vi skal ta denne nettsiden seriøst? Det er kun svada. At du tar det på alvor sier mye om intelligensnivået... 🙄🤦🏻‍♀️

Anonymkode: f75d5...a45

Skulle ikke være anonym! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
1 time siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

http://dangersofvaccines.com/harmful-ingredients-vaccines/

Les og lær. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

https://forskning.no/vaksiner-forebyggende-helse-helse/slik-er-de-som-ikke-vaksinerer-seg/467717

https://sykepleien.no/2019/01/who-vaksinemotstand-er-en-global-helsetrussel

Her er to enkle artikler for deg å lese, jeg vil si disse er mer pålitelige enn din. Og det finnes massevis av mer om det er det det står på.

Anonymkode: f8d97...75e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker

til dere som tror at vaksinemotstandere ikke har peiling. Og uvaksinerte bærer ikke viruser, det gjør de vaksinerte:

 

 

https://www.naturalnews.com/036560_whooping_cough_outbreak_vaccinations.html?fbclid=IwAR1BOcBKfXjQcSn1AE82TZaMie_D5F0-MF89yMXw6Sghx2N7uyNS1ElC818

 

https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/medical-doctor-to-maine-legislators-diseases-persist-due-to-vaccine-failure-not-unvaccinated/?fbclid=IwAR2YM8jz9OVmd_cZCqpjXVr9fQT5-40Sva3VIVTaJuOQ8eFrjYGYbDBGKiU

 

Dr. Meryl Nass Testimony Before the Education Committee, Maine
by Meryl Nass, MD – Board Certified in Internal Medicine
Alliance for Human Research Protection

March 13, 2019

Senator Millett, Representative Kornfield, and members of the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee:

My name is Dr. Meryl Nass. I am here today to oppose LD798 and support LD987.

I am a physician in Ellsworth, Maine.
I graduated from MIT and the University of Mississippi School of Medicine.
In 2010, I was the chair of a commission established by you, the legislature, “to protect the lives and health of members of the Maine National Guard.”
I have testified to 6 Congressional committees, primarily on anthrax vaccine and Gulf War Syndrome, and the permanent injuries suffered by service-members who received military vaccines of questionable quality.
There is no crisis of infectious diseases caused by lack of vaccinations, here in Maine or in the rest of the United States.
The rates of vaccine preventable diseases are approximately the same as always. I have attached the official statistics, so please check me on this!
According to the CDC, effective vaccine exemption rates in Maine are not higher than they have been, and they are consistently better than the US average
The truth, not widely known, is that immunocompromised children are not catching diseases from their unvaccinated classmates, and they are not dying. Look at the numbers.

The diseases that persist and have been in the news remain a challenge, simply because the vaccines have a high failure rate–not because of the unvaccinated.

Pertussis is a problem, because the vaccine works poorly.

66% of Maine cases were fully vaccinated, 83% partially.
The TDaP pertussis vaccine is estimated 67% effective the first year after inoculation, but only 9% effective 4 years later. [1]
Almost all of us are susceptible to pertussis despite vaccination. I have had pertussis twice. I am fully vaccinated.
Given the failure rate of the pertussis vaccine, no herd immunity is possible. The bacteria regularly circulate in the community, as they would even with a 100% vaccination rate.
Pertussis is not a major problem for the immunocompromised, who are in fact regularly exposed.
Similarly, Varicella (the virus that causes chickenpox and shingles) cannot be eradicated even with a 100% vaccination rate.

A full 70% of Maine children who got chickenpox in 2017 had been vaccinated.
Adults with shingles spread the virus; a disease-free environment cannot be attained.
Fortunately, children do not die from varicella, even highly immunocompromised children, for whom several treatments are available. There is approximately one child death per year, in the entire US, from Varicella.
By contrast, influenza–the “flu”–kills about 120 children per year in the US, but again, the problem is that the flu vaccine is weak, and protection wears off quickly.

On average influenza vaccines are 40% effective, according to the CDC. [2]
Herd immunity cannot be obtained, because even if you vaccinate everyone, the majority will not be immune.
In the past ten years in Maine, 2 children have died from influenza.
There has been so much talk about measles, but there has been only one case of measles in Maine in 20 years, from a visitor who did not spread it to anyone.

The numbers speak for themselves. Maine children are already very well protected from those diseases for which we have good protection. Most cases of ‘vaccine preventable’ diseases in Maine are the result of vaccine failures, not the result of unvaccinated children.

Maine’s current vaccination rates are excellent, and have successfully kept measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, polio and other diseases from circulating.

However, the unfortunate fact is that there are no vaccines for the infections that most jeopardize the immunocompromised. Most viruses, fungi and bacteria threatening the immunocompromised have no vaccines against them. Fortunately, the immunocompromised are not catching and dying from vaccine-preventable disease.

If your committee votes to remove exemptions from families that currently avoid immunizations — because parents believe their children are at high risk of an injury — you will cause more vaccine injuries, and possibly deaths. But what you won’t do is prevent many infections in the rest of the population, since the major reason these diseases circulate is that the vaccines are simply not good enough.

The truly serious epidemics in Maine students are teen suicides and narcotic drug abuse. I hope your committee finds ways to address them.
Please look closely at the accurate numbers, from the federal and Maine CDC’s. I am confident they will lead you to oppose this bill.

Read the full article at 
AHRP.org.

In the video above, Maine State Senator Robert Foley testifies in opposition to LD 798 to remove religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions and in support of LD 987 to expand medical vaccine exemptions on the death of his daughter following the DTP vaccine.

References
[1] 
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/rr/pdfs/rr6702a1-H.pdf
[2] https://globenewswire.com/.../Vaccines-Market-worth-over...

Vaccine manufacturers have NO liability (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986), so CANNOT be sued for injury from their product and they have no incentive to make their product as safe as possible.
Vaccines are not held to the same double blind gold standard of clinical testing as other pharmaceutical drugs because they are considered biological products under the Public Health Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. They meet the same standards as cosmetics.
The per vaccine Federal Excise Tax is used to pay vaccine injuries through the Dept. of Justice in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) has paid out OVER $4 BILLION to date.
Vaccines contain neurotoxins (aluminum and mercury) far exceeding “safe levels” deemed by the EPA.
Vaccines contain cancer-causing ingredients, and have never been tested if they cause cancer, infertility or DNA mutation (Section 13.1 of every vaccine package insert).
Some vaccines are made from aborted fetal cell lines. (WI-38 and MC5-5 Human Cell Fibroblasts)
Vaccines are not 100% effective and a vaccinated person can get the disease they were vaccinated for.
A vaccinated person carries the disease they were vaccinated for, “shedding” it, for up to 6 weeks.
The concept of herd/community immunity cannot be achieved by vaccines because vaccines are NOT 100% effective. Unlike lifetime immunity afforded by disease, vaccine-induced immunity lasts 2-10 years.
Doctors receive financial rewards from insurance companies for having patients fully vaccinated (~$400 per patient). They are advised NOT to share all the risks or the vaccine package inserts, so 100% informed choices cannot be made in a doctor’s office when vaccinating.
Vaccine injury is under-reported. VAERS is the only way to officially report a vaccine injury and is tedious with no incentive for a doctor to fill it out.
Vaccine mandates (like SB277 and SB792 in CA) literally hand over new customers to pharmaceutical companies, and remove rights to choose what is injected into a person’s body.
Pharmaceutical companies spend up to 19 times more on advertising than they do on research.
Corporate mainstream media gets 70% of their advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies.
Vaccine safety and efficacy research is not conducted by independent researchers and so is biased.
The full CDC recommended vaccine schedule has never been tested. Vaccinated children are the human experiment.
All vaccines can cause injury or death, and there is no way to tell who will have a reaction.
Most doctors receive 30 MINUTES on vaccine education (that they are safe, effective and a must) during their 8 YEARS in medical school.
If someone dies from a vaccine, their family will be awarded no more than $250,000. Most cases of vaccine injury are dismissed because doctors and vaccine manufacturers deny a causation link. The statutory time limit for filing a claim is only 2 years after death and 3 years from the time of vaccine injury.
The government plan “Healthy People 2020” has a goal to fully vaccinate all children and adults by 2020. There are 217 new vaccines being created right now. How many is too many?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and 
iCanDecide.org sued HHS for 1986 NCVIP Federal Mandate that Safety Studies Are Conducted Bi-Annually. Zero have been conducted. Vaccines are safe and effective? Prove it.
23. BEST Science-based Books: How to End the Autism Epidemic by JB Handley, Plague of Corruption by Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dissolving Illusions by Dr. Suzanne Humphries

 

 

he fact that we have mandatory vaccination laws (daycares/certain healthcare roles) and no vaccine-injury compensation program in place
💥 that children have to suffer a severe vaccine-reaction first before they’re considered eligible for a medical exemption
💥 that a one size fits all schedule is only increasing, with no safety studies conducted on the accumulative effect of all of these vaccines combined or the long term health outcomes for our children
💥 that the media perpetuates a vicious shame and blame culture by constantly misreporting stories, creating hype and hysteria to keep us all in a state of FEAR
💥 that the medical establishment, govt and vaccine industry are not held accountable/liable for the damage they’re doing to our children
💥 that they can staunchly say “vaccines don’t cause autism” and yet they have only ever looked at one ingredient, in one vaccine. But what about the rest?
💥 that many vaccines on the current vaccination schedule are not even theoretically capable of producing a herd immunity effect; and yet we are kept under the illusion that we all need to vaccinate to “protect the herd”
💥 that children like mine are banned from daycare and preschool, even though Professor Peter McIntyre, the Director of the National Centre for Immunization Research and Surveillance, admits that unvaccinated children are not a threat to other vaccinated children
💥 that vaccine reactions are severely underreported in Australia and constantly passed off as a “coincidence”, but yet they’re clearly listed on vaccine package inserts as known side effects
💥 that the govt refuses to conduct a vaccinated vs unvaccinated study to show us all exacty who is healthier, with fewer diseases
💥 that they force us to inject carcinogenic ingredients into our children’s bodies and yet they have never done the safety testing to see if these vaccines are actually causing cancer in our children...

 

 

Dr. Larry Palevsky is a board-certified pediatrician trained at the New York School of Medicine, and one of the leading physicians in the country who, from my view, is actually able to compellingly and convincingly provide sound, rational, scientific justification as to why you need to seriously reconsider the wisdom of choosing vaccines as an option to prevent against most diseases.

“When I went through medical school, I was taught that vaccines were completely safe and completely effective, and I had no reason to believe otherwise. All the information that I was taught was pretty standard in all the medical schools and the teachings and scientific literature throughout the country. I had no reason to disbelieve it.

RELATED ARTICLE:

Over the years, I kept practicing medicine and using vaccines and thinking that my approach to vaccines was completely onboard with everything else I was taught.

But more and more, I kept seeing that my experience of the world, my experience in using and reading about vaccines, and hearing what parents were saying about vaccines were very different from what I was taught in medical school and my residency training.

… and it became clearer to me as I read the research, listened to more and more parents, and found other practitioners who also shared the same concern that vaccines had not been completely proven safe or even completely effective, based on the literature that we have today.

… It didn’t appear that the scientific studies that we were given were actually appropriately designed to prove and test the safety and efficacy.

It also came to my attention that there were ingredients in there that were not properly tested, that the comparison groups were not appropriately set up, and that conclusions made about vaccine safety and efficacy just did not fit the scientific standards that I was trained to uphold in my medical school training.”

Were Vaccines Really the ‘Savior’ Against Past Diseases?

Conventional medicine teaches that the polio and the smallpox epidemics went away because of the vaccines and that most of the diseases that we faced in the 20th century in the United States were brought down because of the power, strength and the implementation of the vaccine policy.

Meanwhile, there are a significant number of studies in the medical literature that actually show there were many other reasons that these infectious diseases went away.

For example, one article published in 2000 in the Pediatrics Journal describes how, before the World War II, the majority of the infectious diseases the US was faced with – such as diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis, measles, influenza, parapertussis, tuberculosis and scarlet fever – were all reduced before World War II and BEFORE there were antibiotics and vaccinations available to treat or to vaccinate against these diseases.

The reasons for the reductions in incidence rates and mortality of these diseases were predominantly due to the implementation of public health strategies, including:

  • Clean water
  • Better living conditions
  • Improved sanitation
  • Improved nutrition

There are many such examples.

Have the Proper Safety Studies Actually Been Done?

So, why is there such a vast difference among intelligent, scientifically oriented, committed and objective scientists and physicians about the safety and efficacy of vaccines? Dr. Palevsky says:

“I think that if you ask most of my colleagues where they get their information, they will say that they read it from the American Academy of Pediatrics, from the AMA, from the CDC, and in their journals. But I would like to challenge most of my colleagues to look through the studies themselves to actually see if the proper scientific studies were done using a proper study group and a proper control group.Were the ingredients in vaccines properly studied?

Is there a difference between being exposed to a virus, bacteria, heavy metal or toxin through the air, food, your intestines and your skin, versus when it’s injected into your body?Have we really looked at what happens to vaccine materials once injected into a child? Is an antibody sufficient to provide protection for a child against disease? More and more studies are coming out to show that:

  • The proper studies haven’t been done
  • Antibodies are not the final way in which your body is protected
  • There is a difference between how children process material through air and food versus through injection
  • There are particles in vaccines that do accumulate in your body and cause impairments in your immune system
  • There are particles in the vaccines that get into your brain, and
  • There are foreign DNA particles that get into your body

For many health professionals it is a shock to discover that there is such a lack of information on the safety and efficacy, and a mounting degree of information that actually raises suspicions about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, and whether or not they have been properly studied.”

What we currently have is a one-sided policy; a one way of thinking that is impossible to really allow for the appropriate debate. Science is truly a field where you ask a question, you find an answer, and you don’t have the biases or the influences that change the way an answer or a conclusion is made. We are not seeing that with vaccines.

On a personal note, I recently received the Visionary Award at the NVIC conference in Washington DC. In my acceptance speech, I basically broke down in tears when I told the audience how I felt when I came to realize that by routinely vaccinating thousands of innocent children at my clinic, I’d probably caused damage to many of them. It was a very difficult thing for me to accept intellectually and emotionally.

How a Conventionally Trained Physician Accepts that Vaccines Can Cause Harm

Dr. Palevsky began his investigation in earnest about 10 years ago because parents came to him with complaints, worries, and concerns that something had happened to their children after they were vaccinated. Interestingly, this is the same way that I became enlightened about vaccines — through the concern of a very patient mother whose family I was taking care of. She gently persisted in showing me the evidence and thank God I listened!

RELATED ARTICLES:

Tragically, most doctors are far too arrogant to even consider that there is any possibility that there might be something wrong with vaccines. Most pediatricians are indoctrinated to simply tell parents that anything related to a bad outcome from a vaccine is a mere coincidence. But how come there are so many of these “coincidences”?

Says Palevsky,

“It is heartbreaking, because I see many of these kids who were developmentally normal, who were doing well, who were speaking, then whose voices and eye contacts were lost, who went into seizures, who developed asthma and allergies, and they had nowhere to go because their doctors told them that they don’t know what they’re talking about. These kids are real.

The literature is showing that there are changes in the immune system of children who are vaccinated, especially if we vaccinate them before one year of age or even at one day of age. The literature is there. It’s good scientific literature, and it shows that more and more of these kids who are suffering from chronic illness are suffering from impairments of their immune system. Whether vaccines are causative or contributory, the literature is showing that there is a role that vaccines are playing in creating the groundwork for these children’s immune systems to start to show signs of impairment and destruction.

… When I look at the studies that the American Academy of Pediatrics and the CDC put out, saying that there’s no correlation between vaccination and autism or vaccinations and asthma, I have to say that the studies just don’t hold up to the scientific standards.

You can’t have 25 children in a study and then report that this proves that no children who get autism have any correlation to being injured by vaccines. This is what the media does: they take these conclusions, put it right out in front of the newspapers and say, “Vaccines don’t cause autism.” When you really look at the studies – and there’s not a proper control group and there’s only 25 people – you can’t make a grand, generalized statement about a general population because you’ve studied 25 children.”

The NVIC Set to Create Groundbreaking Vaccine Safety Research

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) just raised $100,000 and continues to look for donations and sponsors to allow proper safety studies to be done by independent researchers, who aren’t going to influence the outcomes. One study that looked at the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children does exist. Published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in April 2005, that looked at the health outcomes of children who are fully vaccinated, who are partially vaccinated, and who are not vaccinated at all.

All the investigators asked the parents to do was to report atopic illness. Atopic illness means allergies, asthma, eczema, hay fever. The investigators were blinded, meaning they didn’t know which category the participants belonged to.

When they assessed the data, they found that the largest number of reports by parents of children with atopic illness were in the kids who were fully vaccinated. The second highest reports were in the families who are partially vaccinated. And the lowest number of reports was in the children who were unvaccinated…

The investigators performed a statistical analysis to see if the data was based on chance or on real statistical differences, and found there were statistically significant differences between these groups. They couldn’t understand how this was possible because the generally accepted consensus is that vaccines are completely safe and completely effective.

Based on this initial finding, we clearly need to do follow-up studies to ask the same question over and over again; repeat this kind of investigation with different populations across different parts of the country, to unearth the truth! Dr. Palevsky says:

“Certainly, the issue has been raised about the special interests, the money that’s tied, the policies, how much money the vaccine manufacturers stand to make, the doctors who make decisions on vaccines, and how much money they stand to make. But we need the science and not this conspiracy theory… If we just stay with the science, and really start to address the need for the science, and look at the fact that there is a lack of science, we will definitely see that more needs to be done. We have not done due diligence.”

Are Some Vaccines Safer Than Others?

Many may be surprised by Dr. Palevsky’s answer: “… in my research of the vaccines, and of the basic microbiology and virology that we’re trained to know in our medical training, I cannot understand how a vaccine with a virus can be safe.” What most people don’t know is that a virus is not “alive,” per se. It is simply a piece or strand of either RNA or DNA. And even of itself, a virus can’t “do” anything.

In addition it is so tiny that it can only be seen under an electron microscope. It is much smaller than bacteria, which can only be seen in the regular microscope. So viruses cannot be isolated when you make a viral vaccine. All that can be isolated is the tissue, whether it’s human tissue or animal tissue that is believed to have been infected by that specific virus that you’re trying to isolate.

So when a viral culture or a set of cultures are made including the specific virus, you’re going to have the DNA of people or animals who were already infected. Those cells are then taken and grown on animal cells, whether it’s monkey kidney cells or chicken embryo cells. When mixed together, these cells will splice and recombine, which means that DNA from animal cells are going to mix with DNA from the known infected cells with the virus.

So by definition, a viral vaccine contains foreign animal and, even possibly, foreign human DNA. That’s why if you have an egg allergy, you shouldn’t get certain vaccines because it is known that there’s going to be egg protein in the vaccine. So the question is, how safe is it to inject viral material that is embedded into the DNA of foreign DNA cells? What studies have been done to actually test whether foreign DNA is getting into your body; whether it stays in your DNA; whether it gets into your brain; and whether there are foreign animal viruses that are inherently present in animal DNA to begin with?

The Dangers of Adjuvants

Adjuvants are used in vaccines in order to create a sufficiently strong immunological response. Adjuvants augment your immunological response. But there is clear evidence that adjuvants, like aluminum and squalene impair your immune system. So while you may be getting the antibodies desired, you are, at the same time, damaging your immune system. Particularly in children, this can set them up to develop chronic illness.

Pushing for Informed Consent

So, does that mean you should never vaccinate against anything? Dr. Palevsky says:

“That’s something that needs to be left up to the individual parent. I am truly a proponent of informed consent, and I’m truly supportive of families who have done their homework and who have been able to make the choice. What is the possible risk of the illness? What is the possible health outcome if your child gets one of those illnesses?

And how much do you know about those risks versus how much do you know about the risks of the vaccines and the health outcomes of what may happen when children are vaccinated against single, or even multiple, vaccines? And when parents are given both sides, it is up to them to make that informed choice.

It is no longer my role to tell them that they must do this vaccine but not that vaccine, because each parent has to make an informed choice based on their understanding of how diseases occur or don’t occur, what science we have available, and whether they feel comfortable with the devil that they know (the science and the outcomes of disease) versus the devil that they don’t know (science and the outcomes of the vaccine).”

What about the Swine Flu Vaccine?

Echoing many other health professionals, including myself, Dr. Palevsky’s concern is that there haven’t been sufficient amounts of scientific investigation to actually be able to say that the vaccines are safe, or even effective. He says:

“Now if you read the packaging first of the swine flu vaccine, it specifically states that the swine flu or the H1N1 flu vaccine was manufactured in the same manufacturing process as the flu vaccine. Therefore since we believe that the flu vaccine has been sufficiently tested to be safe, we can then conclude that the H1N1 vaccine is safe.

But the public should know that even though our authorities are standing there and saying that the H1N1 vaccine is safe, the proper studies have not been done. … And it’s unfair to say to parents or to the public that if you come down with a flu-like illness, it must be H1N1. In studies that have been done, people who did get the flu had their noses swabbed, and they were found to have H1N1.

What’s missing in these data is a population of healthy people who have not had any flu symptoms – to actually see if their noses contained H1N1 – because if someone is sick and has the presence of an H1N1 virus in the nose, it doesn’t mean that the H1N1 is causing the illness.

You really have to take an appropriate control group to see if people are colonized with that virus even when they’re not sick. So we don’t have that data; we really don’t know. I don’t think we can say with good scientific certainty that people who are getting sick from the flu and who are being diagnosed with H1N1 are actually having H1N1 as the cause.”

Other Ways to Protect Yourself Against the Flu

Again, there’s clear evidence in the medical literature that shows proper hygiene, proper sleep, proper diet, proper supplementation with things like vitamin D (making sure that you get your vitamin D level done first), and perhaps vitamin C, can actually prevent you from getting the flu. Many insist that vaccinated individuals “protect” the unvaccinated against the flu virus – in essence, reaping the benefit of the protection they refuse for themselves, while at the same time putting others in danger. But how does that make sense? Says Dr. Palevsky: “How does vaccinating against the flu virus stop you from carrying the flu virus in your nasal passages?” And yet, this is what many believe.

The Concept of Herd Immunity – BUSTED!

One of the primary arguments that is being used to justify this insane behavior is “herd immunity.”The fact is that vaccination does NOT stop you from carrying bacteria or viruses in your nose, in your throat, in your intestines, in your airway, on your skin, or in your body. But many do not understand the significance of this fact, and have been made to believe that if you’re vaccinated, you won’t carry viruses, and therefore, others will be protected because you’re vaccinated. As it turns out, this belief is NOT based on scientific fact. Dr. Palevsky explains:

“This whole concept of herd immunity is very interesting, because we were taught that herd immunity occurs because a certain percentage of a population gets an active illness. Therefore by a certain percentage of getting the active illness, they impart a protection onto the remaining part of the population that has not gotten the illness yet. And so the herd that is getting the illness is shedding the illness and protecting those who have not gotten it.

In vaccine science, we are extrapolating or concluding that if we vaccinate a certain percentage of people, we are imparting protection on those who have not been vaccinated. And that has NOT been shown to be true, because the true herd immunity in theory is based on an ACTIVE DISEASE, and we know that despite what we’re taught, vaccination does not mimic the natural disease.

So we cannot use the same model of herd immunity in a natural disease in the vaccination policy. But unfortunately, we do use it even though it cannot be used because it doesn’t have scientific backing. What’s most interesting to me is that the entire concept of herd immunity fails to acknowledge that there is a life cycle of the viruses and the bacteria all on their own, and that what turns them on and off may have nothing to do with the percentage of people who have been infected.

All you have to do is look at the SARS outbreak. That virus that we were supposed to fear didn’t infect 70 or 80 percent of the population, which would then impart herd immunity on the 20 or 30 percent that didn’t get the disease.

This is because the virus itself had a life cycle of its own. And so it came and went without any percentage of the population being protected. There wasn’t herd immunity, and yet the virus died out on its own.

We fail to include that viruses have a life cycle, and that they are in relationship to other organisms and to us. Something activates them and something actually stops them, and it has nothing necessarily to do with the percentage of people who would have the illness or who have been vaccinated.

… It is preposterous to think that a child who is vaccinated no longer carries the bacteria or the viruses that they have been vaccinated against. If, in fact, children are vaccinated, then why are parents and public health authorities afraid that non-vaccinated children are somehow carrying something that their children are not, when they should feel comfortable that their children are vaccinated? You can’t have it both ways.

You can’t vaccinate believing that your children are protected and then feel that your children are not protected because somehow, some non-vaccinated child is carrying some secret organism that no one else is carrying. It just doesn’t make any sense.”

The Difference between Natural Immunity and Vaccine-lnduced Immunity

It’s important to understand that the natural illness has greater influence on the health of your body. Says Dr. Palevsky: “In medical school, the mentors that I had saw children in their practices in the 40s, 50s and all the way up to the 80s getting these flu-like illnesses who were properly treated with rest, fluids and proper supplementation.  Those kids had developmental growth spurts after the illnesses were over. There is something to say for these viral illnesses that impart a certain boosting of the immune system of your children. And if we’re not letting them have these illnesses, what are we doing to their immune systems? Aren’t we actually hampering their overall health?”

You need to understand that there’s a significant difference between natural immunity and vaccination immunity. When children are born, they develop natural immunity to hundreds, thousands, millions, and even trillions of microorganisms that they breathe in, eat, and touch through their skin. Their immune systems at the lining of their airways, at the lining of their intestines, and on their skin are actively protecting their body from the outside world.

Those immune systems that are intricately and specifically located in the linings are very important to create memory and protection to the organisms that they continue to breathe, eat, and touch. That immune system response then has a domino effect on creating other memory and immune responses that give your body antibodies and protection. That’s a very important step for how the immune system matures in our children. From the linings, the immune system receives information, sends out signals to all other parts of the immune system, and creates an immune response, memory, and antibodies.

On the other hand, when you inject materials into your body, you are bypassing that crucial first step called the primary line of defense. With vaccination you are just creating an antibody. That does NOT impart long-term immunity because it does not create the kind of memory that occurs when you breathe it in, eat it, or are exposed through the skin, and then go through the course of the natural disease. Some people will argue that this is why we have nasal spray vaccines. However, again, you’re making the assumption that you have not already been exposed to the virus at some point, and you’re also making the assumption that exposure automatically leads to infection. Exposure does not necessarily lead to infection. A lot of it has to do with the overall status of your immune system.

The Dangers of Combining Vaccines

One issue that is frequently ignored is the potential harm from the synergy of combinations of vaccines, which have never been studied. No one knows whether there’s interaction between the bacteria and the viruses in the vaccines administered as part of the childhood vaccination schedule, or if there is interaction in the trace thimerosal (which is still in some of the multi-vials of certain vaccines), or the large amount of aluminum that is in many of them. Dr. Palevsky says:

“There is a scientist named Boyd Haley, who has actually looked into some of the vaccine ingredients and (1) what happens to nerve cells when you inject them in the lab to specific vaccine ingredients, and (2) what happens to the nerve cells when you keep adding another vaccine ingredient.

He specifically showed that in the presence of thimerosal, there’s a lot of damage to nerve cells. When you add aluminum to the thimerosal, you need less thimerosal to create the damage to the immune and nerve cells in the presence of aluminum. Then when you add neomycin – an antibiotic in some of the vaccines – it potentiates the potency of nerve cell damage with aluminum and mercury together.

And when you culture the nerve cells and testosterone, versus estrogen, and you expose them to some of the vaccine ingredients like thimerosal, you actually see that the nerve cells that are exposed to testosterone are more damaged in greater amounts than the nerve cells that are bathed in estrogen. That raises some concern because we do see that children with neurodevelopmental disorders are 4:1, boys to girls. So you have to question whether testosterone actually makes children more vulnerable to exposure to toxins like mercury, aluminum or their combination?

None of these studies have been done in humans. People say, “We can’t do those studies.” And I say, “Why not?” They say, “It’s unethical.” I say, “Well, if it’s unethical to do those studies on vaccine ingredients and combining them together, then it’s unethical to give the vaccines in general.” So we’re missing a lot of important data that we won’t believe, and we’re also missing a lot of important data that we won’t accumulate because most of the studies that are done are by the manufacturers of the vaccines themselves.”

Anonymkode: f4fa0...3fc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Annonse

tante grusom master of law
1 minutt siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Ja, du snakker som du har vett til. Dette er bare svada. Tull og tøv fra ende til annen. Vis til noen seriøse kilder du. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
3 timer siden, Pashla skrev:

Ja. Det veit jeg ettersom jeg hadde meslinger som barn.

Du veit at du kan få det igjen? Blir ikke immun resten av livet selv om sannsynligheten ikke er spesielt stor for at det skjer. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
3 timer siden, Pashla skrev:

Datteren din kan ikke få «sovesyndrom» av vaksiner. 

Jo det kan man. Har en i familien som fikk det. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
3 timer siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

https://forskning.no/vaksiner-forebyggende-helse-helse/slik-er-de-som-ikke-vaksinerer-seg/467717

https://sykepleien.no/2019/01/who-vaksinemotstand-er-en-global-helsetrussel

Her er to enkle artikler for deg å lese, jeg vil si disse er mer pålitelige enn din. Og det finnes massevis av mer om det er det det står på.

Anonymkode: f8d97...75e

Les denne og vær like sikker i din sak etterpå. Her slaktes vaksineindustrien. Skremmende lesing er det! 

https://www.wellnessdoc.com/1200studies/

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
2 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Les denne og vær like sikker i din sak etterpå. Her slaktes vaksineindustrien. Skremmende lesing er det! 

https://www.wellnessdoc.com/1200studies/

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Bare jeg trykket inn på den så hoppet det frem reklamer og konkurranser(?), samt masse farger og reklamer inne på siden, jeg leste ikke et eneste ord av "artikkelen". Skjønte fort at det hadde vært bortkastet tid. 

At du og dere ikke blir flau når dere skal argumentere deres syn med sånne svada-sider som det der?? Hva med å finne kilder fra noen seriøse, det burde ikke være vanskelig om dere har rett? Det som er skremmende er at det finnes folk som tror på det søppelet der!

Anonymkode: f8d97...75e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
2 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Les denne og vær like sikker i din sak etterpå. Her slaktes vaksineindustrien. Skremmende lesing er det! 

https://www.wellnessdoc.com/1200studies/

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Troverdigheten er på topp

"Many experts believe at the current trajectory, somewhere between the years 2025 and 2032, 1 in 2 children will be autistic!!"

 

Anonymkode: 19f60...bfd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
2 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Troverdigheten er på topp

"Many experts believe at the current trajectory, somewhere between the years 2025 and 2032, 1 in 2 children will be autistic!!"

 

Anonymkode: 19f60...bfd

Er du dum? Last ned pdf. 1200 sider med dokumentasjon. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
Akkurat nå, Anonym bruker skrev:

Er du dum? Last ned pdf. 1200 sider med dokumentasjon. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

De som er dum er dem som laster ned 1200 sider fra noe sånt der😂😂😂

Anonymkode: f8d97...75e

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tante grusom master of law
Akkurat nå, Anonym bruker skrev:

Er du dum? Last ned pdf. 1200 sider med dokumentasjon. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Problemet er bare at det ikke er dokumentasjon. Bare livsfarlig synsing og konspirasjon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
1 minutt siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Er du dum? Last ned pdf. 1200 sider med dokumentasjon. 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Beklager, men det er ingen tvil om hvem som er dum her. Kildekritikk er noe du burde vurdere

Anonymkode: 19f60...bfd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
4 minutter siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Beklager, men det er ingen tvil om hvem som er dum her. Kildekritikk er noe du burde vurdere

Anonymkode: 19f60...bfd

Underviser i kildekritikk så det kan jeg godt takk. 

Dere får takke dere selv når dere ikke setter dere godt nok inn i ting. Skummelt å kjøpe alt legemiddelindustrien selger som trygt...... 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anonym bruker
1 minutt siden, Anonym bruker skrev:

Underviser i kildekritikk så det kan jeg godt takk. 

Dere får takke dere selv når dere ikke setter dere godt nok inn i ting. Skummelt å kjøpe alt legemiddelindustrien selger som trygt...... 

Anonymkode: 81f3b...ab7

Skremmende. Kan du ikke komme med link til en seriøs side da?

Anonymkode: 19f60...bfd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Artikler fra forsiden

×
×
  • Create New...