Dere beleste damer

[Anonym bruker]

Janet Cooke (born July 23,1954) was an American journalist who became infamous when she won a Pulitzer Prize for a fabricated story that she wrote for The Washington Post.

 

In 1980, Cooke joined the "Weeklies" section staff of the Washington Post under editor Vivian Aplin-Brownlee. To secure this post, she said she had a degree from Vassar College, studied at the Sorbonne University, and was the recipient of an award at the Toledo Blade newspaper.

 

In an article entitled Jimmy's World, which appeared in the Post on September 29, 1980, Cooke wrote a gripping profile of the life of an 8-year-old heroin addict. She described the "needle marks freckling the baby-smooth skin of his thin, brown arms." The story engendered much sympathy among readers, including Marion Barry, then mayor of Washington, D.C. He and other city officials organized an all-out police search for the boy, which was unsuccessful and led to claims that the story was fraudulent. Barry claimed that Jimmy was known to the city and receiving treatment.

 

Despite growing signs of problems, the Post defended the veracity of the story and Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward nominated the story for the Pulitzer Prize. Cooke was named winner of the prize on April 13, 1981.

 

When the editors of the Toledo Blade, where Cooke had previously worked, read her biographical notes, they noticed a number of discrepancies. Further investigation revealed that Cooke's credentials were false. Pressured by the editors of The Washington Post, Cooke confessed her guilt.

 

Two days after the prize had been awarded, Washington Post publisher Donald Graham held a press conference and admitted that the story was fraudulent. The editorial in the next day's paper offered a public apology. Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward said at the time: "I believed it, we published it. Official questions had been raised, but we stood by the story and her. Internal questions had been raised, but none about her other work. The reports were about the story not sounding right, being based on anonymous sources, and primarily about purported lies [about] her personal life -- [told by three reporters], two she had dated and one who felt in close competition with her. I think that the decision to nominate the story for a Pulitzer is of minimal consequence. I also think that it won is of little consequence. It is a brilliant story -- fake and fraud that it is. It would be absurd for me or any other editor to review the authenticity or accuracy of stories that are nominated for prizes."

 

Cooke resigned and returned the prize. She appeared on the Phil Donahue show in January 1982, and said that the high-pressure environment of the Washington Post had corrupted her judgment. She said that her sources had hinted to her about the existence of a boy such as Jimmy, but unable to find him, she eventually created a story about him in order to satisfy her editors.

 

Cooke was the subject of an interview by Mike Sager, appearing in GQ in June 1996. Sager's article was republished in an anthology Scary Monsters and Super Freaks. The movie rights to her story were reportedly purchased for $1.6 million by Columbia TriStar Pictures, to be divided between Cooke (55 percent), Sager and their agents. The film has not yet been produced.

 

 

 

[Anonym bruker]

http://www.amazon.com/What-Hitler-Where-Would-Today/dp/1579159966

[Anonym bruker]

Margit Sandemo har i sine bøker nevnt "oppvaskbenk" i en roman fra ei tid der denslags ennå ikke fantes. Når man skriver så mange bøker, så tror jeg ikke man alltid er veldig nøye på reaserchen.

 

 

[Småtorsk]

Du finner BØTTER OG SPANN av "sanne" histoirer av typen "Jeg ble missbrukt i en hemmelig, verdensomspennende satankult"-historier som ble utgitt for å være sanne og seinere ble avslørt. Søk på nettet!

 

"Bokhandleren i Kabul" er ei bok jeg synes er problematisk, fordi forfatteren blander fiksjon og fakta uten et tydelig skille. Når hun skriver om ekte, levende personer og dokumenterte hendelser, men også tar seg friheten til å "gå inn i hodet" på dem og skildre deres tanker og følelser som hun UMULIG kan vite noe om, er det problematisk.

 

Og så er det jo alltid mye styr rundt biografier. Akkurat nå er det den nye Bjørnebo-biografien som får pepper og blir beskyldt for å være mer "dokumentarroman" enn biografi.

 

Angående sci-fi: Et søk på "paleo-future" kan gi deg artige eksempler på framtidsvisjoner som ikke akkurat slo til. Denne, for eksempel:http://paleo-future.blogspot.com/search/label/1890s

[Anonym bruker]

"Paktens voktere", men forfatteren påstår jo heller ikke at han skriver sannheten da