Omskjæring av guttebarn

[Anonym bruker]

Jeg har vært sammen med menn med forhud, og menn uten. Og det var ingen forskjell på førligheten mellom dem når det gjelder penishodet.

Hadde de uten forhud vært mer følsomme, vet jeg ikke hvor følsomme mannfolk skal være for at det skal være bedre, for å si det sånn.

Men jeg har kanskje bare vært heldig??

[Anonym bruker]

Vranglære? Herregud.

 

Det er faktisk ikke alle som blir omskåret som babyer kjære deg. I noen land er det vanlig at omskjæringen foregår ved inngangen til puberteten. Selvsagt vil en 13åring vite hva han har mistet. Jeg blir helt matt av dere som tror dere sitter på sannheten når dere tilsynelatende kun snakker fra egen erfaring. Men, jeg hat jo tydeligvis bare ikke skjønt at dere selvsagt vet bedre enn menn som er omskåret, forskere og leger.

 

PS:

arrdannelser skjær ved omskjæring av babyer også. Jeg skrev aldri at det skjedde alle, gjorde jeg vel?

[Anonym bruker]

Hissigpropp.

Når man er så gammel, har man da noe man skulle ha sagt.

Men de går frivillig med på det. De synes det sågar er SPENNENDE Å BLI OMSKJÆRT!!! De vil det selv. De vil det, og ønsker det selv, og det er nesten som en konfirmasjon for gutter i den alderen.

 

Men uansett, disse tallene dine er tull.

[Anonym bruker]

Tall? Hvilke tall?

 

Klart det er et rituale, klart det er betydningsfullt, klart mange gjør det frivillig. Og så da? Hav er poenget ditt? Resultatene kan fortsatt være de samme. Og dessuten skal du ikke undervurdere familiens press i mange situasjoner. Det finnes frivillig og "frivillig".

[Anonym bruker]

Arguments in favor of (non-religious) circumcision:

 

Reason Supporting evidence Arguments against

 

Lower chance of urinary tract infection (UTI) in first year of life Studies show that circumcised boys have a 1 in 1000 chance of UTI, vs. 1 in 100 chance for uncircumcised boys. UTIs are rare in boys and are easily treated.

 

Penile cancer prevention Cancer of the penis is three times more common among uncircumcised men than circumcised men, among whom the disease is virtually nonexistent. Penile cancer affects only one in 100,000 older men and is related to sexual behavior.

 

Lower risk of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) Some studies have shown that the risk of STDs, vaginal disorders in partners, and HIV are lower for circumcised men. Risk is only slightly lower, and sexual behavior is a much better predictor of sexually transmitted disease frequency and type.

 

Cleanliness Uncircumcised males risk infection of the foreskin. Simple education about good hygiene virtually eliminates this risk.

 

Prevention of a more complicated circumcision later in life There are sometimes medical reasons for circumcision, such as phimosis (a condition in which foreskin retraction is impossible); post-infancy circumcisions are painful and carry a higher risk of complications. Phimosis and other penile conditions requiring circumcision are not very common and not generally considered a valid reason for routine circumcision.

 

A son should "look like" his father Some people worry that there may be confusion or even psychological problems if the father's penis is circumcised and the son's is not. Boys won't necessarily "look like" their fathers in all ways anyway -- hair color, eye color, body shape all may differ -- as may the penis.

 

Worry about being "strange" In the past, some adult men have requested circumcisions because they have heard from sexual partners that their penises were "strange," they were teased as children or they felt embarrassed in locker room situations. The statistics have changed so dramatically that, whatever your decision, your baby is unlikely to be considered "strange” in this regard. (In any case, children should be taught to respect individual differences.)

 

 

Arguments for an intact (uncircumcised) penis

 

Reason Supporting Evidence Arguments against

 

No medical reason for the circumcision Why remove a part of an infant's body that functions perfectly well? Circumcision interferes with the way nature intended the body to be. For full-term healthy infants, few risks are entailed in removing the foreskin, while there are some possible medical benefits.

 

Fear of complications As with any surgery, risks are involved, including excessive bleeding, infections or injury to the penis. There are also cosmetic concerns, as the foreskin can be cut too long or too short or can heal improperly. Complications are very rare. This is among the safest of surgical procedures; cosmetic complaints are rare. The complication rate is thought to be one in 200 to one in 500.

 

Pain of the procedure and the memory of the pain after the procedure Studies show infants experience substantial pain from the procedure, as shown by increased heart rate and blood pressure; the "memory" of the pain lasts, as infants circumcised without analgesia have increased sensitivity to vaccinations at four months. The AAP now recommends that some form of pain relief be used for all circumcisions. Complications from these pain medications are rare.

 

Possible risk of conditions that develop because a foreskin is not present When the foreskin is removed, the glans can become irritated, causing the opening of the penis to become too small. Ultimately, this leads to urination difficulties and requires surgery. Other possible conditions are tight, painful erections or adhesions and skin tags. Penile problems developing on a circumcised penis are uncommon.

 

Worry about decreased sexual sensitivity Some people feel the glans toughens up without its protective cover, and the penis is desensitized. No study has shown that circumcised men experience less sexual pleasure.

 

Lack of consent for a potentially life-changing operation Why not wait until the boy has the chance to choose for himself? Subjecting an infant to an unnecessary surgery that will change his body is unfair. Later in life, circumcisions are more painful and more dangerous. Parents have to make many life-changing decisions on behalf of their infants; that’s the nature of parenthood.

 

Financial reasons In some areas, insurance companies or Medicare will not cover the cost of the circumcision (viewing it as an elective procedure). Many circumcision costs are still covered within the U.S. (but not in Canada); you must check with your insurance provider to verify. The surgery is generally not expensive.

 

 

[Anonym bruker]

Sier bare stakkars babyer, som ikke får ta et valg på en såpass stor ting selv. Egoismen til foreldre lenge leve. Tragisk.

[Anonym bruker]

bor ikke du i norden da?

 

å argumentere med at det er vanlig andre steder er lite relevant da det ikke er vanlig her.

 

i vietnam spiser de maur... liksom..?

[Anonym bruker]

Hvorfor er halvparten av innleggene i denne tråden borte?

[Anonym bruker]

Du leser feil tråd,kjære.